Sunday, September 13th, 2009
By Mona Eltahawy
The Washington Post
As deliberations began ahead of voting for the new culture chief of the United Nations, news surfaced last week that Egyptian police had arrested more than 150 people for allegedly breaking the daylight fast of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.
What does a security crackdown resembling Saudi-style morality policing have to do with the U.N. Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization?
A lot, given that a serious contender for that UNESCO job is Farouk Hosni, Egypt’s culture minister for the past 22 years. During his lengthy tenure, Hosni has alienated many Egyptians by suffocating cultural and intellectual freedom while giving a leg up to religious zealotry.
The most strenuous objections to Hosni’s bid have been charges of anti-Semitism tied to comments he made in May 2008 that he would “burn Israeli books” himself if he found any in Egyptian libraries.
Yet the anger behind these protests should be directed at Hosni’s boss, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, who has controlled Egypt for 28 of the 30 years since it became the first Arab state to sign a peace treaty with Israel. When it comes to Israel, Mubarak has perfected the art of double dealing — keeping official and business ties intact (and the border with Gaza closed) but unleashing populist anger at the Jewish state and barring cultural ties ostensibly in solidarity with Palestinians.
In just the sort of backdoor dealings that sustain the peace treaty, Israel has promised it won’t oppose Hosni’s bid in return for an unstated diplomatic trade-off with Egypt.
A stronger case against Hosni’s bid to lead the U.N. cultural organization would focus on how he has used censorship and disregarded individual freedom to ultimately strip Egypt of its robust culture. He might not have actually burned books, but he has banned plenty. In 2006, Hosni ordered all copies of “The Da Vinci Code” confiscated and banned the film from Egyptian screens. Never mind that the Vatican itself hadn’t called for such a ban, that thousands of Egyptians already owned copies of the book and that bootleg DVDs were already on sale in Egypt.
Hosni told an applauding parliament: “We ban any book that insults any religion.”
That ban came in response to a complaint from a Christian parliamentarian, but Hosni, himself an artist, has capitulated to Muslim zealotry, too. In 2001, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood — the Islamic political organization that today is the main opposition to Mubarak’s regime — serving in parliament complained that three novels published by a branch of the Culture Ministry were “pornographic.” They weren’t. One literary critic said, “Anyone excited by the prospect of reading these three novels in order to get a pornographic kick will be very disappointed.”
But within days, Hosni had ordered an investigation, and the books were pulled from circulation.
Not content to merely agree that the novels were “pornographic,” Hosni fired three employees of the Culture Ministry, including the head of the department that published them, and dismissed concerns about freedom of expression by saying: “My fundamental responsibility is to protect society’s values from pornographic works.” He reminded people that Egypt wasn’t Europe.
Hosni has told writers who flouted social values to leave Egypt and has vowed not to publish any book, even novels, that contested religion or violated those values.
For Muslim and Christian Egyptians who believe the state is not in charge of policing our morals, it is disturbing to see the culture minister claim he is the guardian of our values — and only a short step from that to the police in Aswan arresting people last week for allegedly publicly breaking the Ramadan fast, disregarding religious freedoms and the rights of Christians.
The reign of fundamentalists is unsurprising given the stifled political atmosphere in Egypt. Mubarak is Egypt’s longest-serving president in modern history — and for all of his years in power, Egypt has been under a state of emergency that allows him to suspend the rule of law.
One of UNESCO’s missions is to promote freedom of expression, so why would it want a director who has so adeptly stifled such freedom?
Hosni belongs to a regime that has decimated practically all forms of political opposition. The Muslim Brotherhood is essentially the last man standing, and the secular intelligentsia is considerably weakened. When Hosni has agreed that books deserve to be banned, he has flown the flag for the regime’s tactic of outdoing the fundamentalists in religiosity.
Today that tactic involves the use of Salafi Islam — an ultra-conservative interpretation most common in Saudi Arabia — to fight the Brotherhood, hence the Ramadan arrests. The ramifications for Egypt’s already frail freedoms are worrisome, to say the least.
Hosni’s supporters say that it’s time for an Arab U.N. cultural chief. It may be. But with his record, Farouk Hosni doesn’t deserve to head UNESCO. Those of us proud of our Arab heritage, full of artists who challenge and enlighten rather than restrict in efforts to “protect” our morals, know that Farouk Hosni is not the man to represent us.

Comments (9)
F1Helper said:
Didn’t this turn out to be a rumour( arrest of daytime fast braking) maybe for a change you once mention some reference and be it not a tabloid?
Anyway, for once we agree. I assure you no devout muslim in Egypt want Fraouk Hussni in that position. We consider him anti Islamic.
Who will forget his comments about Hijab and that in his own mind he think it’s degrading to women(and also bad for their hair!!). Or the many books that he approved to be printed with state money that spread ideas against, our countries constitute itself (Walima li a3shab el ba7ar)
If it was for the people of Egypt not only they will dismiss Farouk Hussni, but his entire regime. But what can we do when we turn on the news and see the head of the regime shaking hands with the leader of the most powerful country in the world…
September 14th, 2009, 2:13 am
Solomon2 said:
Do you think your column would have been stronger with a quote or two from Egypt’s liberals, maybe even the democratic opposition here in the U.S.?
September 14th, 2009, 9:32 am
Dale said:
I have long since disregarded any claim that the UN makes for legitimacy. They are simply a group of anti-American one-world-government wannabe’s with their agendas out there for all the world to see. They get away with it because nobody truly wants to see.
Farouk Hosni head of UNESCO? Why not? The UN is and always has been about crushing individual expression and any other freedom one could conceive of. Seems to me he’d fit right in.
Dale the Anarchist
September 14th, 2009, 9:48 am
Craig said:
It almost seems like a bad joke, doesn’t it? But when the UN puts the world’s worst human rights abusers on the Human Rights commission and hosts Anti-Racism conferences at which major public figures make blatantly racist rants from the podium, I’m wondering why any of it even matters? In my opinion it’s up to each of us to protect what we have and push for what we want in our own countries, and to hell with the “global community”. I’m pretty effing cynical about the future of mankind because as far as I can see, mankind doesn’t even deserve for things to be as good as they currently are. We’re a bunch of barbarians and we like it that way.
September 15th, 2009, 11:02 am
Joachim Martillo said:
I agree that the passive salafism is for the most part a Saudi import into Egypt.
After studying the Egyptian Muslim brotherhood, I have the impression that it encompasses two somewhat different currents: Westernizing Islamic modernists and Salafist reformers, who want to go back to primary Islamic principles in order to find an Islamic path to modernization.
These two intellectual currents seem to be inherent in the thinking of Sayid Qutb, who in his latest writings developed analysis that could be used to justify the revolutionary Salafism of someone like Ayman al-Dhawahiri.
The last stage of Qutb’s thought developed out of his confrontation with Nasserism, with which Qutb saw no possibility of compromise.
Hasan al-Banna, the Muslim Brotherhood, and Sayid Qutb and their followers have been on the right track.
Basic principles of modern governance typically involve some form of separation of powers, national vs. regional organization, and checks and balances.
As the last 8 years of the Bush administration has shown, checks and balances are hard to maintain in modern Western governments.
In Islamic tradition commitment to sacred law has generally provided an effective check on excessive executive power or caudillismo, but Arab and Islamic modernizers have tended to discard the limits on the executive (rather as happened in France under Louis-Napoléon Bonaparte).
One could argue that the Islamic modernizers have tried to restore the balance to system by reintegrating Islam into the modern state.
Because this project has failed to a large extent thanks to Western interference, a fourth current of thought has developed, which I call Arab Salafi Jihadism and which I discuss in Collision: Jewish-Zionist, Arab-Islamic Transnational Politics.
Someone like Farouk Hosni is a caudillist aparatchik opportunistically trying to capitalize on various Islamic political currents, but he does not really belong to any of them.
Like Hussayn Haqqani in Pakistan (see the discussion of Fatima Bhutto’s op-ed in Who Killed Benazir Bhutto?) Farouk Hosni is also willing to cozy up to Jewish power when it serves his purposes: : [NY Times] Private Motive for Egypt’s Public Embrace of a Jewish Past.
September 16th, 2009, 11:55 am
Joachim Martillo said:
The last link should have been: [NY Times] Private Motive for Egypt’s Public Embrace of a Jewish Past.
September 16th, 2009, 11:59 am
Global Voices Online » Egypt: Will Farouk Hosni be Unesco’s Next Director General ? said:
[...] Mona ElTahawy does not welcome a book burner into the UNESCO: What does a security crackdown resembling Saudi-style morality policing have to do with the U.N. [...]
September 22nd, 2009, 3:51 am
Egypt: Will Farouk Hosni be Unesco’s Next Director General ? :: Elites TV said:
[...] Mona ElTahawy does not welcome a book burner into the UNESCO: What does a security crackdown resembling Saudi-style morality policing have to do with the U.N. [...]
September 22nd, 2009, 5:31 am
Omnia said:
Thank your for posting this great poem of Nizar Kabani,, i didnt read it before, but i truly loved it..at the other end, i totally agree that the nomination of the guy was a BIG question mark form the early beginning and Thanks God he lost it !!!
September 27th, 2009, 5:48 am
Post a comment