Friday, January 18th, 2008
By Mona Eltahawy
CAIRO — Egypt, the first Arab country to sign a peace deal with Israel, once prided itself for being the de facto leader of the Middle East. Now, it has become a vacation backdrop for visiting dignitaries whose attention and business deals are increasingly shifting elsewhere — to the booming economies of the newly influential Arab Gulf kingdoms and emirates.
Over the Christmas holiday, French President Nicolas Sarkozy went sightseeing in Egypt with new girlfriend, supermodel Carla Bruni, and this coupling drew much more attention than the one with Hosni Mubarak. Then last week, in the United Arab Emirates, Sarkozy made headlines not for his love life but for signing deals with the Emiratis to build France’s first military base in the Gulf and to help them develop civilian nuclear energy — this latter, he also promised the Saudis on a trip to Riyadh (where orders came for Nicolas to leave Carla at home).
The most recent reminder of Egypt’s diminished role in regional politics came when President George W. Bush ended his Middle East trip by pausing in the Egyptian Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh.
He thanked Mubarak six times and used the word “appreciate” 10 times. But sweet words don’t hide simple math: Bush spent just three hours in Egypt — an afterthought compared to the two days he had just spent in Saudi Arabia, where he delivered a major arms sale, and sword-danced with the relatives of Saudi King Abdullah.
Bush praised Mubarak for Egypt’s “vibrant civil society.” He seemed to have forgotten meeting civil rights activist and Mubarak critic, Saad Eddin Ibrahim, who has been in self-imposed exile for almost a year. Bush and Ibrahim met in Prague in 2007, and the American president had identified with Ibrahim, saying of himself, “I, too, am a “dissident” in the White House.
Bush’s rhetorical juxtapositions to Mubarak and Ibrahim serve as a clear guide to his double-talk on democracy.
Ibrahim, the real dissident, faces at least 20 court cases if he returns to Egypt, where he spent two years in jail after a politically motivated trial. The cases were raised by pro-regime lawyers and supporters because Ibrahim had urged Washington to make its aid package to Egypt conditional on Cairo’s respect for human rights.
Mubarak’s government receives about $2 billion in annual U.S. aid, including $1.3 billion in military assistance. Some initial concessions to reform and democracy were adopted in 2005, under American and domestic pressure from newly resurgent opposition groups. There is a ways to go, however, to gain “civil society.”
If Bush had spent more than three hours in Egypt, he might have noticed Mubarak’s thugs doling out “civil society.” The day after Bush’s visit, Abdel Wahhab el-Messiri and his colleagues were taking part in a protest in Cairo, and the 70-year-old leader of the opposition Kefaya movement was taken by police and dumped in a desert suburb about 12 miles (20 km) out of town.
On Sunday, Bush said in the United Arab Emirates what he should have said standing next to Mubarak in Egypt on Wednesday: “You cannot build trust when you hold an election in which opposition candidates find themselves harassed or in prison.” Bush was referring to Ayman Nour, Mubarak’s main opponent in Egypt’s first contested presidential elections in September 2005.
Nour has been in prison since the end of 2005 after another politically-motivated trial aimed at removing the popular parliamentarian from politics as Mubarak grooms his son Gamal to take over.
In the UAE, Bush offered lame praise to the Arab Gulf’s various emirs, princes and royals who pay lip service to democracy through ineffectual municipal elections. They have become Bush’s new best friends because Washington views them as the bulwark against Iran’s nuclear ambitions — and the Saudis as a Sunni heavyweight to help realign Iraq’s sectarian fragmentation.
but there was a time when Cairo was the first step on all Middle East roads — especially the one leading to Jerusalem. As the first Arab state at peace with Israel, Egypt was the only country talking openly to all sides in the decades-long Middle East conflict. When Israel and the PLO began their own peace talks, Cairo hosted many rounds and mediated among the various Palestinian factions.
Now Saudi Arabia’s Arab-Israeli peace plan has become the template and Egypt’s main role in the conflict seems to be only as Southern border policeman of Gaza.
Egypt’s diminished role is no surprise considering that Mubarak has been in power for 26 years. His regime is tired, self-serving, and lacking in new ideas.
But the thick skin of longevity will ensure it will survive this week’s snub from Bush — the fourth president to occupy the White House since Mubarak assumed power at the end of 1981.
Whether Americans elect their first woman, black man, or Mormon president later this year, it seems one Mubarak or another will be waiting to receive them.
Mona Eltahawy is an award-winning New York-based journalist and commentator, and an international lecturer on Arab and Muslim issues.
Copyright ©2007 Mona Eltahawy / Agence Global
www.monaeltahawy.com

Comments (3)
Dale said:
The first thing I did after reading this missive was to Google up Carla Bruni. The image search displayed an impressive selection of nude/semi-nude pixel collections. I’m sorry, but tall long-legged anorexics don’t do it for me these days. I’d class her as a four maybe five to Rio Natsume’s ten. Even Mona, who is not a model, rates higher… with all her clothes on yet.
OK, now that I have revealed my general male chauvinism and penchant for Asian women with large breasts, (go ahead and Google “Rio Natsume”… I double-dog dare you!) I’ll get on to more relevant subjects.
Bush has often been accused of “double talk”, as has every other leader of every other nation. I found it refreshing to hear the King of Spain ask Hugo Chavez to “shut up”, and in his own language yet! Unfortunately, double-talk is the Newspeak of diplomacy and has been ever since the White man learned to “speak with forked tongue”.
As an American citizen, I can say that the leaders of most sub-Saharan African nations are little more than poorly educated thugs seeking to enrich themselves and the leaders of many Middle Eastern nations are little better. I could even tell “nigger” jokes in a bar in Africa… at some risk to life and limb perhaps, but there would be no international outcry about a crazy American starting a riot in Nairobi. I can even criticize our own President Bush, though I would not. I think I could run Liberia, for example, if given a chance, but I am not sure that anyone is really capable of running the United States. I certainly could not.
President Bush, and any other leader of a nation cannot afford to offend anyone, especially where the leaders have fragile egos and take offense easily over things most Americans would find trivial. While he did not choose to hold the proverbial big stick, he is most certainly required to walk softly.
A local judge, Richard Greenwood, now retired from the bench, in my city used to have a maxim on the inside of the door to his chamber. It read “Wear your authority very gently.” This is not to say that he was a lenient judge. I personally witnessed him sentencing a man to life imprisonment.
So called “double-talk” is perhaps a modern leader’s way of wearing his authority gently. In times past, it might have been different. In fact, I would prefer a leader who would come right out and speak his mind, whatever was on it at the time. So far as I am concerned, the King of Spain should enter the race for US President, and the Crown Prince of Bahrain as well, for that matter.
We would then have some candidates who, like Ron Paul, do not consult a poll before making a speech or answering a question. Mona could also enter the race… I’d prefer her to Hillary. Alas, non-native citizens and non-citizens can’t be elected. This might be just as well, as Ahnold the Governator would probably enter the race with a reasonable chance of winning. Not to say he wouldn’t be a good president, but the last Austrian to be elected into the leadership of a foreign nation was Adolf Hitler, I believe. It didn’t work out too well for the rest of the world or the nation which elected him.
For whatever criticism one can heap up onto Bush’s plate, and there are many things to criticize the man for, I do not think I could do better, nor do I think that Mona could do better.
And just because I CAN say it: “America Uber Alles!”
January 18th, 2008, 9:24 am
Alfred said:
Out of curiosity, why did you write that the republican choice is Mitt Romney? Is this a common opinion in the international community? It just struck me as odd the quote,
Whether Americans elect their first woman, black man, or Mormon president later this year
Thank you for your time.
January 23rd, 2008, 1:56 am
Craig said:
Hi Mona,
But the thick skin of longevity will ensure it will survive this week’s snub from Bush — the fourth president to occupy the White House since Mubarak assumed power at the end of 1981.
I thought at first that you had misinterpreted the brevity of Bush’s stop in Egypt, until I read this sentence.
Do you really think it would have been better for Bush to bolster Mubarak’s credibility with a more substantial and a more formal “state” visit?
The Bush Administration had high hopes for change in Egypt two years ago. That isn’t true any more. The US has the choice between supporting a long standing but distasteful dictator who generally goes our way on the big issues, or supporting a hostile and even more distasteful opposition. What did you expect Bush to do? Talk up the rights of the Muslim Brotherhood? Promote a fringe movement that seems to be made up primarily of Egyptian socialists and/or anarchists, who seem to dislike the US just as much as the MB does?
Another President would have wholeheartedly embraced Mubarak and all he represents. Bush’s cold shoulder is about as good as it is going to get, in the short term.
Alfred,
Whether Americans elect their first woman, black man, or Mormon president later this year
I assume she selected those because they would all be “firsts” for the US. A Giuliani win would have been a first as well (Italian-American) but he dropped out of the race today.
January 30th, 2008, 6:12 pm
Post a comment