The Two-Way Street of Offense and Bigotry

By Mona Eltahawy
IslamComment
Sept. 13, 2010

I’m a big fan of offense. It was offense that drew me to Park51, the proposed Islamic community centre and mosque in Lower Manhattan, two blocks from Ground Zero. But not for the reasons you think.

For once, Muslims are not the ones offended but the ones being accused of offense by choosing to build Park51 “on hallowed ground.” I don’t believe Park51’s backers mean to offend but let’s set aside intent and talk about freedom to offend.

When Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten published cartoons of Prophet Mohammed in 2005 that led to huge and at times deadly demonstrations across several Muslim-majority countries in 2006, I defended the newspaper’s right to offend. I found the violent reactions to the cartoons more offensive to the memory of the prophet than any of the images.

The freedom guaranteeing publication of those cartoons is the same as that which guarantees Park51’s right to build right there, two blocks from Ground Zero, and the same as that which guarantees the right of a Gainesville, FL, pastor and his congregation to threaten to burn copies of the Qur’an on the anniversary of 9/11.

Note I’m coming at this from the opposite direction of Park51 opponents such as Sarah Palin and John Boehner (Rep-OH) who equate burning the Quran with the proposal to build Park51, issue calls on Pastor Terry Jones not to burn the Quran and then think they can tell Park51 not to build. That’s the wrong kind of tit-for-tat!

My kind of tit-for-tat says the U.S. constitution guarantees freedom of religion and freedom of expression, whether they offend people or not. Hurt feelings cannot be the basis of public policy. And that’s why I’m not calling on Jones to abandon threats to burn the Quran. I have plans of my own that day.

And incidentally, since we’re talking about offense – I find it much more offensive that right-wing blogger Pamela Geller of the “Stop Islamization of America” – which has spearheaded opposition to Park51 – are politically exploiting the anniversary of 9/11. While they claim to speak out on behalf of the grieving families they trample all over their grief and use the anniversary for their own political ends.

The pain of losing someone in the 9/11 attacks is unfathomable. But to ask “Don’t you see you’re being offensive by building here”, is to assume that all Muslims are responsible for the attacks. It’s a slippery slope to even begin that conversation because if Park51 is forced to move it would set a dangerous precedent.

It was one that Bill Kuntz, who’s running for Congress in Miami as an Independent, wanted to set at an anti-Park51 protest where people held U.S. and Israeli flags – I wondered at the outrage had we Park51 supporters held flags of another country.

Kuntz’ opposition to Park51, it turns out, isn’t just about sensitivity to 9/11 victims and their families. He’s opposed to mosques everywhere. He said he opposed plans to build a mosque in a neighborhood in his constituency because the mosque would offend the sensibilities of the neighborhood

I didn’t care much about Park51 at first. I live in Harlem and didn’t imagine I’d regularly commute downtown to TriBeCa when the centre was built. But I began to care when it became one of many mosque projects across the U.S. facing opposition and anti-Muslim rhetoric. And so for Labor Day weekend I joined a motley crew of volunteers outside Park51 to peacefully support its right to build.

For me, the wave of anti-Muslim rhetoric arcs as I celebrate my 10th anniversary in the U.S. I identify as an American and I’m a proud New Yorker. The hate has strengthened my resolve to get out there and tell my fellow Americans: I’m here, I will not be brushed away, let’s talk.

I am eternally grateful to Matt Sky, 26, a web consultant for giving me that chance to talk when he first started standing outside Park51 on Aug. 15, thereby inspiring a small but dedicated group of volunteer sidewalk activists. Many of them are not Muslim but I joined them as an American Muslim saddened to hear that only 37 percent of Americans know a Muslim.

Some come to Park51 to talk with the sidewalk activists. A 9/11 first responder who lost two friends told me he thought Park51 should move out of respect. A physician who tended to the 9/11 wounded said she couldn’t wait for the community centre to open so that her daughter could use its pool but she worried Park51 would become a target of violence.

Some came to offend. Internet televangelist Bill Keller arrived with an entourage and an American flag wrapped around his neck. (Isn’t that a desecration of the flag?)

“I feel passionately that 1.5 billion people will burn in hell because they believe in the lie of Islam,” he told the cameras, hamming it up with concerns he claimed he had for Muslim women’s rights. Ironically as he spoke, six American Muslim women stood behind him holding signs reading “Peace Tolerance Love” and not one of us looked the least bit like chattel.

A husband and wife team dumped on the sidewalk shoes made out of foam with insults written on the soles such as “Are you stoned?”, “Sticking Our Tongues Out At Sharia Law” and “Sharia Hamas Organization Extremist”. As the husband taunted us, the wife filmed our reactions.

Someone left a bag of dog feces on Park51’s stoop one night. Opponents circled Park51 with a decommissioned missile attached to the back of their car.

This year’s 9/11 anniversary coincides with the end of the Muslim fasting month of Ramadan. This Muslim will spend her Eid teaching in Oklahoma. While Terry Jones leads his congregation in burning Qurans in Gainesville, I will teach my students to revere books. Thank God for the Constitution.

During his first U.S. media appearance since Park51 became the “Ground Zero Mosque” unleashing all kinds of hell, Imam Feisal Abdel Rauf, a spiritual backer of the center, told CNN that Park51 must continue or else headlines in the Muslim world would portray Islam as under attack in the U.S. and it would give radicals in the Muslim world reason to threaten U.S. national security.

Quite frankly, that is nonsense. Park51 should continue because it’s more an issue for American Muslims – over here, in the U.S. – than it is about the Muslim world, radicals or not. Yes, the ability of the U.S. to lecture anyone on religious freedom would be seriously compromised but for an imam to play the card of the “radicals in the Muslim world who would threaten our national security” is dancing on the stereotype of Muslims as crazies who need little reason to go berserk.

That was essentially the reason which a number of U.S. officials from the president himself to General Petraeus in Afghanistan used as they lined up to plead with Pastor Jones in Gainesville to cancel his threat to burn the Quran. Instead of emphasizing that burning books would put him on the same ignoble path as Nazis and the mobs which burned Salman Rushdie’s “Satanic Verses”, the message was “Don’t drive the crazy Muslims even crazier!”

Opponents of Park51 have also began using a dodgy logic of their own to oppose it. In the words of one woman I encountered on Twitter: “How many churches are there in your country?” She didn’t consider for a second of course that “my country” could be the U.S. and even, as the case is, if I was born in another country (Egypt), she was assuming that all Muslim-majority countries are like Saudi Arabia, the only country in the Persian Gulf that bars the building of houses of worship for non-Muslims. It became the shameful exception in 2008 after the first Catholic church — bearing no cross, no bells and no steeple — opened in Qatar.

In Saudi Arabia, it is difficult even for Muslims who don’t adhere to the ultra-orthodox Wahhabi sect; Shiites, for example, routinely face discrimination.

So I had the pleasure to enlighten my interlocutor on Twitter to the fact that “my country” has some of the oldest churches in the world. The idea that there were Christians “over there” had, I’m sure never occurred to her; just as the idea that there were Muslims “over here” – i.e. me tweeting from NYC.

While I hesitate to call everyone who opposes Park51 a bigot, a recent Washington Poll post has shown that most opponents to the center hold the most negative views of Islam.

But we must not lose sight of the need to fight their bigotry as well as that of the people “over there”. I further told my Twitter interlocutor that it saddened me deeply that Christians and other minorities in my country of birth faced bigotry and that it was imperative to fight bigotry “over here”, “over there” and everywhere.

The Muslim world has little to stand on if it tries to complain about how the United States treats its Muslim citizens – that’s why it should stay out of this argument and leave it to American Muslims to have, based on our constitutional guarantees and not based on any false claims to a moral high ground.

While Egypt does indeed have some of the oldest churches in the world, unfortunately my Christian brothers and sisters face bigotry and immense difficulty in building churches. They must obtain a security permit just for renovations.

Bigotry must be condemned wherever it occurs. If majority-Muslim countries want to criticize the mistreatment of Muslims living as minority communities elsewhere, they should be prepared to withstand the same level of scrutiny regarding their own mistreatment of minorities.

And to anyone else who wants to know how many churches there are in “my country”, I ask simply: do you really want to compare the U.S. to a dictatorship (albeit one of America’s best friends in the Middle East)?

Offense and bigotry are two way streets. Let’s remember to look in both directions.

Comments (5)


Amy said:

I am glad to have you as a fellow American. I was wondering about the statistics of how many Americans know a Muslim– I was glad you put it here, because now I know. I believe from the bottom of my heart, that if more Americans met and came to know Muslims, much of this rhetoric would disappear.

9/11 changed my life. I’m pursuing a degree in Arabic now. But, it’s yielded a benefit I never expected– I’ve met such wonderful Muslims who I am honored to call my friends. I remember distinctly how just about all of our first conversations went– somewhere in there, usually right at first, after the introduction, they would hasten to say that they did not support terrorism, it was not what Islam taught, etc. It made me wonder how other people reacted to them.

I know others who have had conversations with me about how awful Islam is, as well as its adherents, when “they” do this or that, etc, etc. And I’ve said to them, and to myself: “You wouldn’t say that if you knew any Muslims!” Because that’s when the archetypes are eliminated– when you see that, despite differences, people have some similarities. My Muslim friends are just like my other friends. They have dreams, families, values, hopes, wants, fears… Maybe I sound cliche, but I believe it’s true.

Thank you for your blog.

September 14th, 2010, 12:09 am

 

Solomon2 said:

The legal right to build Cordoba House is not in dispute. The moral right to do so is. Fair or not, as the American public conceives it now, if the project goes forward Americans will point to it for years to come as a symbol of Muslim insensitivity and cruelty towards non-Muslims.

“A physician who tended to the 9/11 wounded said she couldn’t wait for the community centre to open so that her daughter could use its pool but she worried Park51 would become a target of violence.”

I have to smile a little at this. The MCC a few miles from my home made promises similar to those of the organizers of Cordoba House (“dedicated to serving all human beings, regardless of faith, color, origin, and creed of the service seeker”), but when it was completed and the rules of use published they added these provisos: “When there is a call for prayer (adhan), everyone is requested to proceed to the Masjid for prayers…The MCC hall will not be available for future rental to any individual or group who will violate any or all of these rules and regulations.” link. Compelling non-Muslims to attend Muslim prayer services? Is there any reason to suppose Cordoba House won’t be just as welcoming?

September 14th, 2010, 6:50 am

 

Askia said:

Dear Mona,

You (un)wittingly seem to be passing off ‘Offense-for-the-sake-of-offense’. I ask, what is the point of a right to offend? If its a statement of one’s freedom – no problem there, but then all those in America (for instance) who object to the Koran burning do not deny the inherent constitutional right Pastor Jones to burn as he pleases. I for one, accord him, that right or freedom.

In a number of European countries, it is against the law to deny the Holocaust; those who do can be jailed or fined. The logic of your position casts this as wrong! That position, I’m afraid is the real offense.

But pre-1939, would you also hoist this flag of a freedom to offend as Hitler and the Nazis rampaged against Jews in Germany. If I object (within lawful means I concede) to being offended, is there anything wrong in that?

September 14th, 2010, 11:37 am

 

Roger Still said:

I would prefer to see ALL churches of ALL organised religions firebombed, preferably when they are full of their brainwashed sheep. It would bring peace and stability to the world. Organised religion has caused more pain, misery, & loss of life to this planet than all the diseases, accidents, natural disasters and non-religious wars combined. To Hell with holiness, I’d rather have intellect…
God gave us brains to better ourselves & not to disempower others, which is what religion does. People only have enough religion to hate, not to love. “The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose” – Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice
Here’s something for the Christians to chew on: Philippians 2:12.
To Hell (if it indeed exists) with all organised religion, give me spirituality.
And that’s my two cents worth…Have a great day.

September 15th, 2010, 6:43 pm

 

Lady Gaga (og Medina) er topmålet af vestlig civilisation | Damefrokosten.com said:

[...] ære, krænkelse, straf, skam og konformitet. Den liberale muslim Mona Eltahawy har gentagne gange erklæret sig for fan af ”offense” eller krænkelse: når nogen erklærer sig krænket eller stødt over en handling eller udtalelse, [...]

June 7th, 2011, 9:52 am

 

Post a comment